CRS Report on Immigration of Temporary Lower-Skilled Workers: Current Policy and Related Issues
Please check the attached CRS Report on "Immigration of Temporary Lower-Skilled Workers: Current Policy and Related Issues".
Please check the attached CRS Report on "Immigration of Temporary Lower-Skilled Workers: Current Policy and Related Issues".
FAQs: Moving to India in 2025 on H-1B extension, I-140 portability, and future U.S. opportunities || Extending parent's stay in the U.S. beyond six months on a B-2 visa
I have a question about my mother's stay in the US on a visitor (B2) visa. I am an IT Professional in the US on an L1 work visa along with my family (spouse & kid). My only sibling (younger sister) is also settled here in the USA. My father passed away a couple of years back in India. My mother is 60+ years of age, and currently, there is no family member in India to stay with her at all times. She visits the USA and stays with us for six months at a stretch during the year. Considering her health and emotional support needs, I am looking for options to have her stay with us long-term (beyond a six-month period in a year). As is the case in this scenario, are there legally valid options/exceptions for old-age single parents?
Yes, it is possible.
Deferred Action for the "Dreamers" -- Youthful Illegal Aliens
17th June 2012 at 07:20 PM
I have received a lot of questions from people on the new policy announced by the White House on 15 June, 2012, what they refer to as “Reform for the Dreamers.” Essentially, what is being addressed is those people who are below the age of 30, came into the US before they were 16, and have been here for five years. So the idea is the people who are illegally here and were here at a relatively young age, we want to protect.
And the policy as announced by the President is motivated by the fact that these folks have come here, they’ve studied hard, they’ve worked hard, and they came not because they wanted to come, but because they came as a child, and they had no control over where they were.
Let me make one thing very clear at the outset. This program does nothing for people who are legal residents or immigrants or temporary residents of the United States. It does nothing if you are legally in the USA and your children are here legally in the USA, it does nothing for you. Stop listening if that's what you are interested in. But if you want to know more about the law and how it is shaping up, I will tell you more as best as I can based upon our knowledge as it exists today.
So the idea here was that you want to protect those people who came here without their own volition, without their own desire. They are here because their parents are here. And the President said that he wanted to step in and take care of these folks because this is not a new effort. It was started as early as six years ago. I know it because we were very actively involved at one point in this process as well.
The President talks about six years ago, the unlikely trio John McCain, Ted Kennedy, and President Bush had come together to champion this so called “Dream Act,” but, unfortunately, according to the President, the Republicans blocked it in the Senate. So the idea here is that the President wanted to step in and do whatever he could without involvement of Congress. So remember, Congress passes laws, whereas the Executive Branch of government, which is the President and all the agencies underneath the President, including DHS, USCIS, etc., all of them implement and execute the laws. When you are implementing something or executing something, remember that your authority is limited. You cannot create new rights. You cannot create more laws. Because of that, the President made it clear and USCIS made it clear that we are not creating any permanent entitlement.
What we are going to do is this: if you meet the criteria, we will give you temporary residence in USA for two years. It carries no other rights except the right to work. The details would be implemented within 60 days, so let me get to that document. This is probably the most informative document to date. These are the Frequently Asked Questions that the government has put out.
The duration of the deferred action is for a period of two years, subject to renewal.
What does deferred action basically mean? It means, “We will not deport you, we will not remove you, and we will not send you outside USA.” That does not create any new rights. It does not make you a permanent resident. It does not make you even a legal non-immigrant, like an H-4 or E-2 visa holder. It does not give you anything substantive. It basically gives you the right not to be deported until government changes its mind, and they can change their mind right away. There is nothing in law that says they cannot change their mind. The use of prosecutorial discretion confers no substantive right.
It does not make you legal in the USA. They want to begin implementing the process within sixty days of June 15, and the rights are available immediately, but they will start orderly implementation within 60 days.
Then they talk about who is eligible. The individual must have come to the USA under the age of sixteen; must have been here five years before the date of this memorandum (which is June 15th, 2012); must currently be in school or have graduated from high school or have obtained a general education development certificate (GED) or be an honorably discharged veteran of the Coast Guard or Armed Forces of the US; and must have not been convicted of felony offense. No felony. If there is even one felony, you can't qualify for this. Also, you can’t be convicted of a significant misdemeanor offense, and they define what significant misdemeanor offense means. Also, you can’t be convicted of multiple misdemeanor offenses or otherwise pose a threat to national security or public safety. So if you have a criminal background or have a history of being a threat to national or public safety, you will have a problem. And you must not be above the age of thirty.
Then they talk about what is deferred action. They define it. It basically means, “We will not send you out.” It does not mean whatever unlawful presence you have already accrued gets washed away. What does that mean? In a very basic manner, once your I-94 expires or you enter US without inspection, if you come through the border without being inspected in other words (for example, a coyote brought you to USA), the fact that you are getting deferred action now does not mean all your past problems are washed away. So be very careful. Do not think that, because unlawful presence of one year will bar you from getting any kind of status in USA for ten years unless you qualify for a very narrowly tailored waiver. It is very difficult to get a waiver on something like that. Just because you are getting a differed action now does not mean that all the past “sins” and infractions have been washed away. They are still there. Those violations are not going to go away.
You will receive employment authorization and remember that deferred action can be terminated anytime. Then they talk about how they are going to implement them. Individuals who are not in removal proceedings (meaning you are in the immigration court right now), some people who are in removal proceedings will be treated differently. One classification is individuals who are not in removal proceedings or who have already been ordered to be removed (meaning their proceedings are over and the judge has said, “Okay. You need to be removed. You need to be sent away.”) Those people will be treated little bit differently. Individuals who are still in proceedings will be treated differently. So they have these various methodologies that they are going to come out with. We still do not know all the details yet, but they will be treating these people differently, but all of these folks will have the right to get their work authorization and deferred action as long as they meet those four to five criteria that I have mentioned earlier.
Another thing that the government mentioned was that the people who they have already identified, they are automatically giving them deferred action without having to apply. So basically the government is acting upon its own accord. There is a lot of information in this Frequently Asked Questions document. I will attach that document to this little conversation that I have here.
Then they talk about what kind of documentation you need to show that you came to USA before the age of 16, that you have resided here for five years, and that you were physically present in the US as of June 15, 2012. They said provide us financial records, medical records, school records, employment records, military records, but that is not the only thing. You can give anything that you think tends to prove your presence in the USA that will help you.
So now this where they talk about what they consider a significant misdemeanor offense. First of all, a felony is anything that is punishable by more than one year in prison, according to this definition. So anything that is punishable by more than one year in prison, if you have been convicted of that, you do not qualify. You also can’t have a significant misdemeanor and they define it here. A significant misdemeanor is a federal, state, or local criminal offense punishable by no more than one year of imprisonment and, even if no imprisonment-- that is the key point-- even if there is no imprisonment-- but involves violence, threat, assault, domestic violence, sexual abuse or exploitation, burglary, larceny, fraud, driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs, obstruction of justice, bribery, or unlawful flight.
So there is a whole list of things that, if you have been convicted of, even if they were a misdemeanor, you will not qualify. And if you have three misdemeanors, you will not qualify at all. And they talk about what threat to public safety is. It is, for example, gang membership, participation in criminal activities, or participation in activities that threaten the Unites States.
What if my case is not approved? Can I ask for an appeal? The answer is no. You cannot get an appeal, but they will set up a public procedure where you can ask the supervisor of the case officer who decided your case to look at the case again and decide.
Do my dependents or immediate relatives get benefit? No. This is only for you, the person who qualifies.
Can I travel outside United States? The answer is, “We have not decided that yet.” I will be very careful with that, because, if you are subject to unlawful presence and you have been here over a year under unlawful presence, travel outside USA could bar you for ten years.
I hope this gives you some information on what you need to do and what this is all about. Feel free to post a message here if something is not clear.
Good luck, folks.
Release Date
12/02/2024
USCIS has received enough petitions to reach the congressionally mandated 65,000 H-1B visa regular cap and the 20,000 H-1B visa U.S. advanced degree exemption, known as the master’s cap, for fiscal year (FY) 2025.
USCIS will send non-selection notices to registrants through their online accounts over the next few days. When USCIS finishes sending these non-selection notifications, the status for properly submitted registrations that USCIS did not select for the FY 2025 H-1B numerical allocations will show:
Quotes and Excerpts from Rajiv in the article:
Topics Discussed:
Release Date
12/17/2024
Rule will provide greater benefits and flexibilities for U.S. employers and specialty occupation workers, helping to meet U.S. labor needs
I got my H1B Approved (I have I-797B) through Consular Processing by Company A this year. After a few months, I got laid off from Company A and they Revoked my H1B petition (after Oct 1). I have not yet activated my H1B status (currently on STEM OPT EAD). The Immigration team at Company A said that I could do the Change of Status with Regular H1B Transfer from new employer. (As I would be considered Cap Exempt Individual with I-797B).
Can I know if I need to re-enter the lottery again or if it is possible to file a new H1B petition and change it to Company B?
If your H-1B was approved but not activated (e.g., through change of status or visa stamping), you likely need to re-enter the lottery if it’s revoked. However, if the H-1B was activated (e.g., you worked on it), revocation doesn’t usually require re-entering the lottery, though you may need to refile through a new employer. Always consult an attorney for specifics.
I was on H1B (shows automatically revoked), then switched to B2, then switched to F1 (current status) without leaving the US.
1 - Will automatic revocation of H1B cause any issues? Is it simply because the employer has submitted a withdrawal after terminating my role?
2 - When I find a new job that sponsors, will the revoked H1B cause any issues? I have only used 4 months of my initial H1B. It will be a switch from F1 to H1B if everything works out.
Just wanted to clarify what "Case Was Automatically Revoked" means; revoked - sounds a bit concerning. My role was terminated.
If your H-1B was automatically revoked after activation (i.e., you were already on H-1B status), it typically won’t affect future sponsorships or job changes. However, if it was revoked before activation, issues may arise, and it’s recommended to re-enter the lottery to ensure eligibility.
Q1: My brother was recently laid off from his current company. Let's say he applied for an H1B transfer within 60 days (grace period) with Company-A, and it’s still in process. Then, after 60 days, can he apply for an H1B transfer with Company-B (better opportunity)?
Q2: To follow up on the above scenario, if his H-1B is denied (company-A), how much time does he have to leave the country?
Q3: He was notified about his last day as Oct 30th. Does his 60-day grace period end on Dec 30th? Or is it 60 working days?
*Note: His current company said they have not revoked the H-1B.
If someone applies for an H-1B transfer within the 60-day grace period and later applies for another transfer after 60 days, they can file multiple petitions. However, for approval to continue working in the U.S., the first petition (filed within the grace period) must be approved. Otherwise, they may need to leave the U.S. for visa stamping.
The 60-day grace period starts the day after the last fully covered pay period, not the paycheck date, and it consists of calendar days, not working days.
Topics Discussed:
On Jan. 8, 2025, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services issued guidance in the Policy Manual, Vol.
SUBSCRIBE to Immigration.com YouTube Channel for further updates.
mmigration.com, Law Offices of Rajiv S. Khanna PC, US Immigration Attorney
SUBSCRIBE to Immigration.com YouTube Channel for further updates.
mmigration.com, Law Offices of Rajiv S. Khanna PC, US Immigration Attorney
The Department of Homeland Security’s H-1B final rule and H-2 final rule take effect on Friday, Jan.
I am in the US with an approved COS from B2 to F1, so my F1 visa is yet to be stamped on my (Indian)Passport.
1. My STEM masters program is for 9 months, and my I20 has a start and end date of 2 years(2026). Do I have to stamp before the end of 2 years to avail myself of the OPT and STEM validity?
2.I might have to visit a family member in Canada sometime in mid-2025 after my master's program has started. Is it advisable to go to Canada since I do not have the F1 stamped on my Visa? If I can visit, then will I require a different visa?
3. Is it possible for me to schedule my F1 Visa stamping in Canada during the visit? Or would you advise something different here? Or is it better to get it stamped in Mexico?
If you are on an F-1 visa converted from B-2, your visa stamp is only necessary if you plan to travel outside the U.S. While in the U.S., your status is governed by your I-94, which typically says "DS" (duration of status) and remains valid as long as you maintain your student status.
If traveling briefly to Canada or Mexico for under 30 days, you can use Automatic Visa Revalidation (AVR) to return without a visa stamp, provided you haven’t applied for and been refused a visa during your visit. Scheduling visa stamping in Canada is risky—if denied, you lose AVR eligibility and must return to India to reapply.
I have accepted the first company’s offer, and it has filed for my H1B transfer. Now, I want to sign an offer from Company two and potentially join it. So, should I make the company speed up the process and delay joining the company in order not to get issues during the green card process? What if the company forces me to join?
You can file multiple H-1B transfers simultaneously, and it's legal. Approval of one transfer doesn’t obligate you to join that employer, nor does it affect your existing H-1B status with your current employer. You can choose to join any employer whose transfer gets approved, provided all transfers were filed while you were in valid status with your current employer.
However, if your H-1B validity is close to expiring (e.g., within 6 months), later-filed transfers may require "bridge petitions" to maintain continuity of status. Consult an immigration lawyer to ensure proper handling and avoid complications.
I worked in the US for the last 3 years on STEM OPT but did not get selected in the H1B lotteries. I returned to India in June 2024 and have been working with the same company since then. My employer plans to file my L1A visa petition after July 2025.
Can I also participate in the upcoming H1B lottery?
Would applying for the H1B affect my L1A petition?
Additionally, given that I have worked outside the U.S. for a year within the last five years with the same company, is it possible to transition from H1B to L1A status?
Yes, L-1A holders or applicants can also apply for the H-1B lottery. Filing for H-1B will not impact your L-1A application unless there’s a discrepancy in the job descriptions for the two applications.
Additionally, if you’ve worked outside the U.S. for at least one year in a managerial role, you can transition from H-1B to L-1A later.
My status: H1B + i140 approved (6 months completed)
Wife's status: H4 (applied for H4-EAD in July 2024)
My wife has a small business In India that she operates from here. She is currently in India (has been in India since Nov'24) and is traveling back to US (Jan'25) via Abu Dhabi.
1. Is she allowed to work for her India company in US? Everything she earns is in INR
2. If asked at port of entry, do you work in India, should she say yes or no?
An H-4 visa holder operating a small business in India from the U.S. could potentially violate their visa status, even if earnings are in Indian rupees. At the port of entry, honesty is essential—lying could lead to a permanent U.S. entry ban, which is hard to waive.
While it's unclear if this constitutes a status violation, it’s a borderline case. To avoid risks, it’s advisable not to engage in such activities while on H-4 status.
I encourage you to sign a petition urging the Obama Administration to reinstate reissuance of nonimmigrant visas within the USA, a practice that was discontinued in 2004. If the petition receives 100,000 on-line signatures by February 23, the Administration has promised to review it, send it to the appropriate policy experts in the administration, and issue an official response.
Visas for Domestic Employees of B, E, F, H, I, J, L, O, P, and Q Visa Holders and U.S. Citizens Temporarily Assigned To The United States (B-1)