Search

We won a case for National Interest Waiver a Microbiologist holding a Ph.D., 12 publications and over ten years research experience. We were able to provide evidence of a strong national interest through numerous letters of recommendation from leading scientists.  This applicant had an international reputation in his field.

We won a case for Outstanding Researcher a Cellular and Molecular Biologist with 8 prestigious awards, professional society memberships and multiple letters of recommendation from leading scientists.  We were able to provide evidence to show extensive contributions to the field of cancer research.

We won a case for Outstanding Researcher a Physicist with 11 years research experience.  He had 17 publications, a Ph.D. in solar cell research and numerous letters of recommendation from leading scientists around the world.  His skills were noted by experts as being scarce in the field .

We won a case for Outstanding Researcher for applicant with 12 years of field experience as well as multiple years teaching.  We were able to provide 14 letters of recommendation.  The applicant had 14 publications in prestigious international journals.  Experts in the field described candidate as “one of the few to reach the very top of the field.”

This applicant was a data recovery specialist under contract with the U.S. government providing critical skills to a high-level project.  It was noted by referees that his knowledge and background were rare and greatly needed in the interest of our national defense.  We provided documentation of his academic achievements as well as additional specialized training.

We won this case for an applicant with five years research experience.  The applicant was able to secure a very strong letter from the National Science Foundation director which detailed the innovative and pioneering work of the applicant.  It was noted that his skills were critical for an initiative developed by the Foundation.  We also offered evidence of his strong Ph.D. work as well as his publication record.

We first obtained an O1 for this applicant by identifying his talents and expertise to be a cut-above his colleagues with similar educational and work experience.  This applicant received a prestigious international award which set him apart from other research scientists in his field.  He was noted for ground-breaking work in drug addiction research.  We obtained recommendation letters from world experts and they noted that this applicant was one of the few researchers in the field who had achieved the highest level of success and had become

We obtained both and Outstanding Researcher and National Interest Waiver for this applicant.  Based on his strong academic record and exceptional work experience we were able to obtain letters of recommendation from leading experts around the world.  The applicant was currently working for one of the most prestigious research/teaching institutes in the world.  His innovative research was noted internationally and he had multiple scholarly articles in well-respected journals.  He also held membership in leading professional societies.&nbs

We won this case for the applicant based on his exceptional research record evident by his numbers of publications and invited presentations.  At the time of filing, the applicant's research work had been cited over 100 times which is indicative of the high-quality, highly regarded work that he does.  Referees noted that this applicant was one of the very small percentage of scientists who achieve the highest level of success in their given field.

We won a case for National Interest Waiver for a Physician working in a medically underserved area.  We provided a five year contract, copy of his J-1 Waiver approval, numerous experience letters, a letter from the Department of State and documentation to reflect statistics of health professional shortage in the area.

We won both an EB1 Alien of Extraordinary Ability case and a National Interest Waiver for this applicant.  He was noted as being an exceptionally qualified, brilliant and outstanding researcher amongst an international peer group.  We provided copies of his substantial publication record as well as evidence of his numerous "invited" presentations.  This applicant had patented material which was identified as innovative and pioneering in the field and admired by top researchers.

We won this case as the applicant was noted to be a critical component to the success of various projects and had a very large impact on the research program.  Referees described this applicant's talents to be rare and difficult to replace by U.S. workers.  Her original and pioneering research made her uniquely qualified to further this intrinsically important research which greatly effected the nation as a whole.

We won this case for the applicant who had over twelve years research and teaching experience.  He was considered a critical component to the success of his current project.  At the time of filing, the applicant had over 22 publications in prestigious, international scholarly journals.  The applicant's significant contributions had been cited by other renowned researchers in his field.  His Ph.D. work was highly regarded and noted to be admired by several leading experts.

This applicant had over twelve years of research experience. We noted the applicant's international reputation in the fourteen recommendation letters submitted.  The applicant was a member of a prestigious professional society membership of which requires noted achievements in the field.  We provided evidence of the extensive presentations the applicant made due to his level of expertise in the field.

We won this case for the applicant who had an extensive publication record with over 40 publications at the time of filing.  The recommendation letters noted his extraordinary talents and unique background as well as his vast knowledge in optical telecommunications.  This applicant was requested to review for a world-renowned electrical engineering professional society journal.

We won an EB1 Outstanding Researcher/Professor case for an applicant holding an M.B.B.S.   This applicant had over eight years of teaching and research experience in addition to his experience practicing as an Internal Medicine physician.  He was world-renowned for his exceptional contributions to his field of medicine.  We offered 17 exceptional recommendation letters from experts around the world who acknowledged the high level of achievement of this individual.

We won a National Interest Waiver case for a Molecular Biologist holding a Ph.D. having over ten years of research experience. We argued that her qualifications were unique as compared to others in the field and that she was noted as one of the few in her field that has achieved the highest level of success. She had remarkable contributions to the field, most notably her significant discoveries in cardiovascular research. This applicant had an extensive publication list as well as a book chapter.

We won an Outstanding Researcher case for a Research Associate Ph.D. in Instrumentation and Master of Science in Materials Science with over 13 years experience. We argued that with his extensive list of achievements, i.e. 11 refereed journal articles, 7 manuscripts currently under review, 11 publications in conference proceedings, peer reviewing of manuscripts and selection as a doctoral fellow at a world-renowned institute, he more than qualified for the category. This applicant's work was funded and supported by NASA.