H-1B Visa Changes

H-1B Visa Changes

Discussing various changes taking place in H-1B visas.

Video URL

admin Wed, 04/05/2017 - 14:20

H-1B for Programmers - 2017 Guidance

H-1B for Programmers - 2017 Guidance

Note From Rajiv: 
There is nothing new in this memo that we have not encountered before.  What USCIS  has said in this memo is that the IT title “Programmer” is not necessarily a job that requires a degree AND further a degree in specific discipline.  If we claim otherwise, we have to prove our case.  We have to do that in many, many cases anyway.  Like I noted earlier, this is not new.



U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Office of the Director (MS 2000)
Washington, DC 20529-2000
March 31, 2017 PM-602-0142

Policy Memorandum

SUBJECT: Rescission of the December 22, 2000 “Guidance memo on H1B computer related positions”

This policy memorandum (PM) supersedes and rescinds the December 22, 2000 memorandum titled “Guidance memo on H1B computer related positions” issued to Nebraska Service Center (NSC) employees by Terry Way.

This PM applies to all U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) employees. The updated guidance is effective immediately.
• Sections 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b) and 214(a)(1), (c)(1), (i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), Title 8, United States Code, sections 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b) and 1184(a)(1), (c)(1), (i).
• Title 8 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), section 214.2(h).

On April 1, 2006, USCIS instituted “bi-specialization” procedures that discontinued the adjudication of H-1B petitions by the NSC and the Texas Service Center. On July 1, 2016, the NSC once again began to directly accept certain H-1B and H-1B1 (Chile/Singapore Free Trade) petitions. USCIS instituted this change to help address a large increase in H-1B petitions and provide the operational flexibility to redistribute caseloads as necessary to meet processing goals.
Now that H-1B petitions are once again being adjudicated by the NSC, USCIS officers at that service center may inadvertently follow the prior, but no longer adhered to, memorandum entitled “Guidance memo on H1B computer related positions” (dated December 22, 2000) from Terry Way, the former director of the NSC. As the guidance provided in this NSC memorandum is not an accurate articulation of current agency policy, USCIS is rescinding it to prevent inconsistencies in H-1B and H-1B1 adjudications between the three service centers that currently adjudicate H-1B petitions.
PM-602-0142: Rescission of the December 22, 2000 “Guidance memo on H1B computer related

Page 2
One concern with the Terry Way memorandum is that it is now somewhat obsolete. Relying on the 1998-1999 and 2000-01 editions of the Occupational Outlook Handbook (Handbook),1 it was issued during what the NSC Director called a period of “transition” for certain-computer related occupations.2 In addition, this memorandum also relied partly on a perceived line of relatively early unpublished (and unspecified) decisions, which did not address the computer-related occupations as they have evolved since those decisions were issued.3
But more importantly, statements in the memorandum do not fully or properly articulate the criteria that apply to H-1B specialty occupation adjudications. While the memorandum stated that most programmers had a bachelor’s degree or higher based on information provided by the Handbook, that information is not particularly relevant to a specialty occupation adjudication if it does not also provide the specific specialties the degrees were in and/or what, if any, relevance those degrees had to the computer programmer occupation. Further, the memorandum failed to mention that only “some” of those that had a bachelor’s or higher degree at that time held a degree in “computer science . . . or information systems.”4
Furthermore, the memorandum also did not accurately portray essential information from the Handbook that recognized that some computer programmers qualify for these jobs with only “2-year degrees.” While the memorandum did mention beneficiaries with “2-year” degrees, it incorrectly described them as “strictly involving the entering or review of code for an employer whose business is not computer related.” The Handbook did not support such a statement.
Rather, the 2000-01 edition did not make such a distinction and described all programmers as sharing a fundamental job duty, i.e., writing and testing computer code. According to the current version of the Handbook, this is still the case; and individuals with only an “associate’s degree” may still enter these occupations.5 As such, it is improper to conclude based on this information that USCIS would “generally consider the position of programmer to qualify as a specialty occupation.”

Page 3
The memorandum also does not properly explain or distinguish an entry-level position from one that is, for example, more senior, complex, specialized, or unique.6 This is relevant in that, absent additional evidence to the contrary, the Handbook indicates that an individual with an associate’s degree may enter the occupation of computer programmer. As such, while the fact that some computer programming positions may only require an associate’s degree does not necessarily disqualify all positions in the computer programming occupation (viewed generally) from qualifying as positions in a specialty occupation, an entry-level computer programmer position would not generally qualify as a position in a specialty occupation because the plain language of the statutory and regulatory definition of “specialty occupation” requires in part that the proffered position have a minimum entry requirement of a U.S. bachelor’s or higher degree in the specific specialty, or its equivalent. See section 214(i)(1) of the Act; 8 CFR 214.2(h)(4)(ii).7
Based on the current version of the Handbook, the fact that a person may be employed as a computer programmer and may use information technology skills and knowledge to help an enterprise achieve its goals in the course of his or her job is not sufficient to establish the position as a specialty occupation. Thus, a petitioner may not rely solely on the Handbook to meet its burden when seeking to sponsor a beneficiary for a computer programmer position. Instead, a petitioner must provide other evidence to establish that the particular position is one in a specialty occupation as defined by 8 CFR 214.2(h)(4)(ii) that also meets one of the criteria at

USCIS regularly reviews the Handbook on the duties and educational requirements of the wide variety of occupations that it addresses; however, USCIS does not maintain that the Handbook is the exclusive source of relevant information.

In stating that the computer programmer occupation was in transition, the NSC Director presumably relied on information in the 2000-01 edition of the Occupational Outlook Handbook. That edition indicated that the computer programmer occupation included those with varying and shifting job titles and descriptions due to the many technological innovations in programming at that time.

While 8 CFR 103.3(c) provides that precedent decisions are binding on all USCIS employees in the administration of the Act, unpublished decisions are not similarly binding.

U.S. Dep’t of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Outlook Handbook, 2000-01 ed., “Computer Programmers.”

See U.S. Dep’t of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Outlook Handbook, 2016-17 ed., “Computer Programmers,” https://www.bls.gov/ooh/computer-and-information-technology/computer-pr… (last visited Mar. 31, 2017).
PM-602-0142: Rescission of the December 22, 2000 “Guidance memo on H1B computer related

6 Officers are reminded that “USCIS must determine whether the attestations and content of [a Labor Condition Application (LCA)] correspond to and support the H-1B visa petition.” See Matter of Simeio Solutions, LLC, 26 I&N Dec. 542, 546 (AAO 2015). Accordingly, USCIS officers must also review the LCA to ensure the wage level designated by the petitioner corresponds to the proffered position. If a petitioner designates a position as a Level I, entry-level position, for example, such an assertion will likely contradict a claim that the proffered position is particularly complex, specialized, or unique compared to other positions within the same occupation.
In general, a petitioner must distinguish its proffered position from others within the same occupation through the proper wage level designation to indicate factors such as the complexity of the job duties, the level of judgment, the amount and level of supervision, and the level of understanding required to perform the job duties. U.S. Dep’t of Labor, Emp’t & Training Admin., Prevailing Wage Determination Policy Guidance, Nonagric. Immigration Programs (rev. Nov. 2009), available at https://www.foreignlaborcert.doleta.gov/pdf/NPWHC_Guidance_Revised_11_2…. Through the wage level, the petitioner reflects the job requirements, experience, education, special skills/other requirements, and supervisory duties. Id.

Officers are also reminded that USCIS does not bear the burden of establishing that a particular position does not qualify as a specialty occupation. Instead, the petitioner bears the burden of establishing eligibility for the benefit sought. Section 291 of the INA, 8 U.S.C. § 1361. Accordingly, USCIS officers may not approve a petition based on inconclusive statements from the Handbook about the entry-level requirements for a given occupation. Rather, the petitioner bears the burden to submit probative evidence from objective and authoritative sources that the proffered position qualifies as an H-1B specialty occupation.
PM-602-0142: Rescission of the December 22, 2000 “Guidance memo on H1B computer related

8 Specifically, the court explained in Royal Siam, 484 F.3d at 147, that:
The courts and the agency consistently have stated that, although a general-purpose bachelor’s degree, such as a business administration degree, may be a legitimate prerequisite for a particular position, requiring such a degree, without more, will not justify the granting of a petition for an H-1B specialty occupation visa. See, e.g., Tapis Int’l v. INS, 94 F.Supp.2d 172, 175-76 (D. Mass. 2000); Shanti, 36 F. Supp. 2d at 1164-66; cf. Matter of Michael Hertz Assocs., 19 I & &N Dec. 558, 560 ([Comm’r] 1988) (providing frequently cited analysis in connection with a conceptually similar provision). This is as it should be: elsewise, an employer could ensure the granting of a specialty occupation visa petition by the simple expedient of creating a generic (and essentially artificial) degree requirement.Page 4
8 CFR 214.2(h)(4)(iii). Section 214(i)(1) of the INA; see also Royal Siam Corp. v. Chertoff, 484 F.3d 139, 147 (1st Cir. 2007).8

This memorandum is intended solely for the training and guidance of USCIS personnel in performing their duties relative to the adjudication of applications and petitions. It is not intended to, does not, and may not be relied upon to create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or by any individual or other party in removal proceedings, in litigation with the United States, or in any other form or manner.
Contact Information

If USCIS officers have questions or suggestions regarding this PM, they should direct them through their appropriate chains of command to the Office of Policy and Strategy.

admin Mon, 04/03/2017 - 15:25

Justice Department Cautions Employers Seeking H-1B Visas Not to Discriminate Against U.S. Workers

Justice Department Cautions Employers Seeking H-1B Visas Not to Discriminate Against U.S. Workers

Department of Justice
Office of Public Affairs
Monday, April 3, 2017

Justice Department Cautions Employers Seeking H-1B Visas Not to Discriminate Against U.S. Workers
The Justice Department cautioned employers petitioning for H-1B visas not to discriminate against U.S. workers. The warning came as the federal government began
accepting employers’ H-1B visa petitions for the next fiscal year. The H-1B visa program allows companies in the United States to temporarily employ foreign workers
in specialty occupations such as science and information technology.
The anti-discrimination provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) generally prohibits employers from discriminating against U.S. workers because of their
citizenship or national origin in hiring, firing and recruiting. Employers violate the INA if they have a discriminatory hiring preference that favors H-1B visa holders over
U.S. workers.
“The Justice Department will not tolerate employers misusing the H-1B visa process to discriminate against U.S. workers,” said Acting Assistant Attorney General Tom
Wheeler of the Civil Rights Division. “U.S. workers should not be placed in a disfavored status, and the department is wholeheartedly committed to investigating and
vigorously prosecuting these claims.”
The division’s Immigrant and Employee Rights Section (IER), formerly known as the Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices, is
responsible for enforcing the anti-discrimination provision of the INA. The statute prohibits, among other things, citizenship, immigration status and national origin
discrimination in hiring, firing or recruitment or referral for a fee; unfair documentary practices; retaliation and intimidation.

For more information about protections against employment discrimination under immigration laws, call IER’s worker hotline at 1-800-255-7688 (1-800-237-2515, TTY
for hearing impaired); call IER’s employer hotline at 1-800-255-8155 (1-800-237-2515, TTY for hearing impaired); sign up for a free webinar; email IER@usdoj.gov; or
visit IER’s English and Spanish websites.
Applicants or employees who believe they were subjected to discrimination based on their citizenship, immigration status, or national origin in hiring, firing or
recruitment or referral, should contact IER’s worker hotline for assistance.

17-349 Civil Rights Division
Civil Rights
Updated April 3, 2017

admin Mon, 04/03/2017 - 16:27


USCIS targets employers for H-1B investigation unverifiable, H-1B dependent, and off site consultants

USCIS targets employers for H-1B investigation unverifiable, H-1B dependent, and off site consultants

From Rajiv: To identify employers who are abusing the H-1B visas, USCIS will now target for investigation three specific types of H-1B employers: unverifiable, H-1B dependent and consultants working at client sites.

USCIS Release

Agency Creates Avenue for American Workers to Report Abuse

WASHINGTON – U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) today announced multiple measures to further deter and detect H-1B visa fraud and abuse. The H-1B visa program should help U.S. companies recruit highly-skilled foreign nationals when there is a shortage of qualified workers in the country. Yet, too many American workers who are as qualified, willing, and deserving to work in these fields have been ignored or unfairly disadvantaged. Protecting American workers by combating fraud in our employment-based immigration programs is a priority for USCIS.

Beginning today, USCIS will take a more targeted approach when making site visits across the country to H-1B petitioners and the worksites of H-1B employees. USCIS will focus on:

  • Cases where USCIS cannot validate the employer’s basic business information through commercially available data;
  • H-1B-dependent employers (those who have a high ratio of H-1B workers as compared to U.S. workers, as defined by statute); and  
  • Employers petitioning for H-1B workers who work off-site at another company or organization’s location. 

Targeted site visits will allow USCIS to focus resources where fraud and abuse of the H-1B program may be more likely to occur, and determine whether H-1B dependent employers are evading their obligation to make a good faith effort to recruit U.S. workers. USCIS will continue random and unannounced visits nationwide. These site visits are not meant to target nonimmigrant employees for any kind of criminal or administrative action but rather to identify employers who are abusing the system. 

Employers who abuse the H-1B visa program negatively affect U.S. workers, decreasing wages and job opportunities as they import more foreign workers. To further deter and detect abuse, USCIS has established an email address which will allow individuals (including both American workers and H-1B workers who suspect they or others may be the victim of H-1B fraud or abuse) to submit tips, alleged violations and other relevant information about potential H-1B fraud or abuse. Information submitted to the email address will be used for investigations and referrals to law enforcement agencies for potential prosecution.

Existing H-1B Fraud Measures

Since 2009, USCIS has conducted random administrative site visits to ensure that employers and foreign workers are complying with requirements of the H-1B nonimmigrant classification. USCIS refers many cases of suspected fraud or abuse to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for further investigation.

Additionally, individuals can report allegations of employer fraud or abuse by submitting Form WH-4 to the Department of Labor’s (DOL) Wage and Hour Division or by completing ICE’s HSI Tip Form.

Further information

For more information about the new H-1B visa fraud and abuse detection initiative, visit the Combating Fraud and Abuse in the H-1B Visa Program web page.

For information about H-1B petition requirements, visit the USCIS H-1B webpage.

admin Mon, 04/03/2017 - 12:58