|
Our
Services ==>
Sample Cases From our Files ==>Sample Cases Of Nonimmigrant Visa
Sample Cases Of Nonimmigrant Visa From Our Files
B-1/B-2 Visa
Type of
Case: B-1/B-2 Visa
Comments: We requested a
reconsideration of a B-1/B-2 visa denial by a US Consulate in India. The
applicant and his wife applied for visa to visit their son in the U.S. The wife
was granted a 10 year multiple entry visa, but the husband's application was
denied based on Section 214(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (possible
immigrant). This obviously made no sense. Why would one of the husband-wife
applicants be denied while the other one granted the visa? We requested
reconsideration, fully explaining the circumstances in his favor and providing
further proof.
Status: B-1/B-2 visa granted.
F-1
Visa
Type of
Case: F-1 Visa
Comments: We were approached by the parents of an applicant whose
application for an F-1 visa had been denied based on Section 214(b) of the
Immigration and Nationality Act (possible immigrant).Normally, we would have not
been able to do much. But in this case, the visa applicant had already
visited USA three times in the past and left in time.While it was true that her
entire family lived in USA, the fact remained that she had never violated any US
laws, despite having an opportunity to do so. We filed for reconsideration.
Status: F-1 visa granted.
H-1/H-4 Visas
CASE
01
Type of
Case : H-1B - Specialty Occupation
Comments: We were recently retained to address a strange problem. An H-1 petition was approved, but the parties did not receive the approval notice for two years. The notice was apparently lost in the mail. They submitted an application for a duplicate approval notice, which also was issued and also lost in the mail. The employer then filed an application for an extension of status, which was granted without an I-94 attached to it. CIS considered the beneficiary to be out of status, because the employer had not placed the beneficiary on their payroll for two years. We submitted a motion to reconsider to USCIS as well as a supplemental brief together with an application for extension of H-1 status pointing out the legal implications of CIS decision.
Status: The case was approved by USCIS with the I-94 attached.
CASE
02
Type of
Case : H-1B - Specialty Occupation
Comments: Our
client, an electronic document management company was issued Intent
to Revoke from the Texas
Service
Center. Our client had filed an H-1B
for the Beneficiary, which was approved by the Service. However, the American
Consulate subsequently revoked the petition following an interview
with Beneficiary. The
Consular Officer determined that the Beneficiary was not qualified
to work as a Systems Analyst.
Specifically, the Consular Officer claimed that Beneficiary
did not have the requisite university-level coursework in Computer
Science.
The
Petitioner sought the Beneficiary for the position of Systems
Analyst because of Beneficiary’s extensive education and background
in medicine. The
Petitioner needed a Systems Analyst to develop electronic medical
records management software.
The Consular Officer erred by assuming that the Beneficiary
should have the same qualifications as a computer programmer. The foregoing arguments were
developed in a lengthy Response to the Intent to Revoke, which was
submitted to the Service.
In addition, we argued that the Consular Officer was not
supposed to readjudicate the petition, and in this regard he erred.
Status: The
Beneficiary’s I-129 petition was approved shortly after we filed the
Response.
CASE 03
Type of Case : H-1B - Specialty Occupation
Comments: The consulate revoked an H-1B in 1999. The client received
notification of the revocation from USCIS in 2004. In the mean time he was
still working in USA. We argued against these inconsistent and
unconstitutional procedures and submitted an application for extension of his
status in 2004.
Status: H-1B extension approved.
CASE
04
Type of Case: H-1B - Specialty Occupation
Comments: We have filed no less than 200 cases where USCIS
had denied the application or objected to an application based on the fact that
the title and position did not require professional level employees. So
far, we have won almost all the cases we have filed on motions to reopen or as
new filings. Status: H-1B extension approved
.
CASE 05
Type of Case: H-4 - Derivative Visa
Comments: We filed a case on behalf of
our client against USCIS where the H-4 dependents' application for a
change status was denied by USCIS because the application was not
filed in a timely manner. The dependents were Citizens of
Canada who wanted to transfer from TN status to H-4 status.
Due to circumstances beyond their control they were found by USCIS
to have lost their lawful status in the U.S. We filed a Motion
for Reconsideration with USCIS. USCIS approved the application
and the applicants were granted H-4 status
retroactively.
Status: H-4 status approved retroactively
.
CASE 06
Type of Case: H-4 - Derivative Visa
Comments: We filed a case with USCIS where the H-4 dependents
of the H-1 visa holder were out of status since 2000. They believed that
they were in legal status as long as the H-1 visa holder maintained status in
the US. We filed a request for an extension of their H-4 status
accompanied by a brief in support of the application. USCIS granted the
extension of stay and issued approval notices with the I-94's
attached. Status: H-4 status
approved
CASE 07
Type of Case: H-4 - Derivative Visa
Comments:
We filed a case against the USCIS where the H-1B visa holder
attempted to maintain legal status for both him and his H-4
dependents. The attorney at the time filed the application for
the H-1 extension, but neglected to submit applications for the
extension of the H-4 dependents status. We submitted a request
to USCIS for the extensions of the H-4 dependents' status with a
detailed legal brief. USCIS granted the request for extension and
the I-94's were attached to the approval
notices.
Status:H-4 status approved
H-2B Visa
Type of Case: H-2B Visa
We have won several
cases where USCIS objected to the temporariness of the position.
H-1B2 (For Department
of Defense) Visa
Type
of Case: H-1B2
- Specialty Occupations Related to DoD (Dept. of Defense)
Cooperative Research and Development Projects or Coproduction
projects
Comments: We
have provided consultation and completed some DoD H-1B cases. In one
of these, the beneficiary was about to reach the six-year limit of
his H-1B status, and changed to a H-1B2 in order to be eligible for
an additional four years of stay. It appears USCIS itself is
unfamiliar with H-1B2 visas. We often end up educating CIS on even
the most basic legal issues in this area.
Status:
Changed
to a H-1B2 status in order to be eligible for an additional
four years stay.
J Visa
Type of Case: J Visa
Comments: We have won several cases on extreme and
exceptional hardship grounds in addition to the more routine J-1 waivers.
We have also processed several J-1 changes of MUA location matters for
physicians.
K-1 and K-3 Visas
Type of Case: K-1 and K-3 Visas
Comments: We have obtained several K status
approvals including cases where applicant and beneficiary had not actually
met.
L-1/L-2 Visas
We have won many L visa cases including blanket L-1 approvals and related
consular issues. Many of the cases mentioned below are cases for start-up
companies. We have helped start up various companies for clients in diverse
businesses. Some of our more challenging
cases have included:
CASE 01
Type of Case: Denial of an L-1A for a
buyer
Comments: USCIS
denied an L-1A (filed by the corporate counsel) because the buyer was not
considered to be an executive/manager. She was not supervising any
personnel. We were retained to refile the case. We won the case by
showing that though she did not have supervisory responsibility; she was an
executive level employee.
Status: L-1A’s approved
CASE 02
Type of Case: L-1A
Denail for aFranchise Operation
Comments: We were able to obtain a series of
L-1A approvals despite earlier denials. We showed through substantial evidence
that a franchise operation may qualify for L-1 visas. USCIS maintained that there can never be any actual ownership and control
of the petitioning organization by the foreign related company since it is
actually owned by the franchisor in the United States. We successfully
challenged this and received approval.
Status: L-1A’s approved
CASE 03
Type of Case: L-1A
Comments: We
obtained an L-1A for the director of a consulting company ("think tank") that
interprets the impact of political events on financial markets and keeps
institutional investors informed on U.S. and world events.
Status: L-1A’s
approved.
CASE 04
Type of Case:
L-1A transfer
Comments: We obtained
an L-1 transfer for the president of a company where the company, after one year
of operation underwent a structural change impacting the relationship between
the company abroad and the company in the U.S. There were some complex issues of
ownership and control. We successfully transferred the beneficiary to a
new company that was spun off through the structural change .
Status: L-1A
transfer approved.
CASE 05
Type of Case: L-1A
Comments: We
obtained an L-1 for the owner of a company where the USCIS posed an objection
that the company had only one employee and a team of consultants. We were able
to obtain approval, nonetheless.
Status: L-1A approved.
CASE 06
Type of Case:
L-1A
Comments: We
obtained a start up L-1 for the president and owner of a company opening a chain
of grocery stores. Though the foreign related company had an unrelated business,
our firm was able to justify why the beneficiary needed to be transferred to the
U.S. to start up the new, unrelated business.
Status: L-1A approved.
O Visa
Type of Case: O Visa
Comments: We have won several O-1 approvals.
In almost all cases the challege has been demonstrating what the field of an
applicant's expertise is.
R Visa
Type of Case: R Visa
Comments: We have obtained several R-1
visas. One case that presented an interesting challenge was where the
applicant performed secular, administrative duties. CIS believed that an R
visa was not appropriate. We were able to show facts and law that
convinced the USCIS to issue the visa.
|