DREAM Act /Student Adjustment Act of 2003 12 August 2003 Senators Orrin Hatch (R-UT) and Richard Durbin (D-IL) introduced the bipartisan Development, Relief, and Education for Minors (DREAM) Act of 2003 (S.1545) on July 31.In the House, the Student Adjustment Act, H.R. 1684, was introduced on April 9, 2003 by Rep. Chris Cannon (R-UT) along with 15 Democratic and 15 Republican original cosponsors. Under current law, 50-65,000 students graduate from American high schools each year who have been in the U.S. more than five years but who face limited prospects for completing their education or working legally in the United States because they were originally brought here by parents lacking immigration status. Among those prevented from completing their education are valedictorians, honors students, award winners, class presidents, and student leaders. As these young people deserve a fresh start, both in fairness to them The DREAM Act would address this issue in two ways: * by deleting a federal provision that interferes with a state's right to determine which students qualify as "residents" for purposes of in-state tuition or other state education benefits; * and providing a mechanism for certain long-term resident immigrant students with good moral character to apply for legal residency so that they can work and otherwise fully participate in their communities
Eliminate the federal provision that discourages states from providing in-state tuition. The DREAM Act would eliminate a
provision of law enacted in 1996 that currently requires lawful immigration
status in order to qualify for any post secondary education
benefit based on state residency. That is, foreign nationals who are not
in the U.S. lawfully cannot get reduced, in-state tuition rates in their
states of residence unless the same benefit is available to any U.S.
citizen or permanent resident who is not a state resident. By changing
this rule, the DREAM Act would allow states to decide whether to extend
in-state tuition rates in these cases. As is well known by anyone who has
had to pay tuition in the U.S., there is an enormous difference in fees
between in-state and out-of-state tuitions. The DREAM Act would
also expand eligibility for relief known as Cancellation of Removal and
Adjustment of Status. Eligibility is limited to a particular group of
younger students and a particular group of college students or recent
graduates. The first eligible group is foreign nationals who are at least
12 but under 21 years of age at the time the law is enacted (when and if
that occurs). The students would have to meet the following additional
requirements: high school diploma or the equivalent, physical presence in
the U.S. for at least five years preceding the enactment of the law, and
good moral character. The other eligible group is college students or
graduates who would have met the requirements at any time during the
4-year period immediately preceding the date of enactment. On the House side - a companion bill - the Student Adjustment Act is still on hold and is waiting for the House leadership to decide whether or not it will get an opportunity to be attached to some other legislation. The objective of this bill is to amend the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 to permit States to determine state residency for higher education purposes and to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to cancel the removal and adjust the status of certain alien college bound students who are long-term U.S. residents. This Act would provide higher education benefits for Student Adjustment Act Applicants. The Student Adjustment Act ensures that students who are applying for immigration relief under the legislation may obtain Pell grants and student loans on the same basis as other students while their application is being processed. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||