Jump to:

Form I-765

Guestbook Entry for Dilip Jeyram, United States

Name: 
Dilip Jeyram
State: 
VA
Country: 
United States
Comment: 

I have engaged Rajiv's office for over 10 years now for many different reasons. I've also been recommending Rajiv's law offices to my aquaintences & friends for over 10 years now. I have very close examples of people who lost 3-5 years going to some other lawyer & later, at  my advise, going through Rajiv's office, who somehow 'fixed everythin' ???? Rajiv once told me ... ' why do you want to engage my office? this is so simple, you can do it yourself and save some money..."  if you expect more from a lawyer... you are crazy!!!!! For Rajiv, its not about the money... he REALLY wants to 'do the right thing'. Rajiv provided me guidance for a new case - at no cost just because I was a old client -  & literally advised me I could save money by doing the work myself - it was very simple. I was infact, ready to pay him or some other lawyer 100s of $s because this was a inquiry near & dear to me. There is no better example of honesty & forthrighness ( i've dealt with many lawyers in my lifetime & if you have a better example, I'd certainly like to hear it) .  I'd ( & have already ) recommend Rajiv for his unparalleled knowledge & honesty in a instant & have also, personally, gone back to him time and again - H1B , family visas, family GC, company visas etc etc etc - again & again......its a no-brainer for me... & yeah.. I'd put my money where my mouth is.... --DJ

Posted on: 
17th Nov, 2011

Guestbook Entry for Neeraj Sharma, United States

Name: 
Neeraj Sharma
State: 
California
Country: 
United States
Comment: 

I got my physical Green Card today. It has been a long 4-5 years and I must say that it could have NOT been possible without the constant support, guidance, diligent and patient hard work put in by Mr. Rajiv S Khanna and his stellar team of Mathew Chacko, Prerna Mehta, Richa Narang and others who I have interacted with in the past and are probably no longer with the law firm. This team was always a step ahead, instantaneous in answering ANY questions whatsoever. I have even spoken to Mr Rajiv himself at one occasion since I was really concerned about some issues and even though being extremely busy was very nice in giving me a phone appointment the very next day. He, along with his team were very courteous, non judgemental and above all very humble in their approach and conversation. I could NOT have been able to get through with this entire process without them. I did not receive any RFE, everything was done in time and with utmost precision. Once again Many thanks from the bottom of my heart. Neeraj

Posted on: 
8th Sep, 2010

Guestbook Entry for Hari & Anju Nayar, United States

Name: 
Hari & Anju Nayar
State: 
NY
Country: 
United States
Comment: 

Hello, My interactions with the Law offices of Rajiv S Khanna started in Aug 2004 when I first applied for my H1 visa. Ever since, I have reached out to Mr. Khanna, Mr. Chacko and other support personnel (Ms. Mehta, Ms.Bhasin, Ms.Baker) for all my immigration related needs. This group of professionals is the best you can ever hope to find to help you navigate the complex and painfully slow immigration process. Rajiv and his team form a tremendous body of knowledge and the beauty of this group is that they provide their expertise as a 'service'. It is true that the law firm charges fees for processing ones case, but the amounts charged are far less than what one would have to pay elsewhere for service that is typically not on par. Mr. Khanna himself has called me on numerous occasions to clarify a question or seek more specific detail....it amazes me that the seniormost attorney in the firm takes time to do this and that too without charging a single dime for a personal call. My wife and I used Rajiv's offices to handle our Green Card application. The process was lengthy and stretched over 6 years from start to finish. I'm glad to report that the GC was granted. Without Rajiv's group supporting this would have been a nightmare. The team that handled my case did their work in the most professional manner possible. I got prompt replies to my emails, voice messages and on occasion even emails and calls over the weekend. I have probably inundated mailboxes with questions and counter arguments...never once have I been discouraged from asking questions nor have I not gotten a clear and definitive answer for my queries. Over the green card process, Rajiv's group renewed my Advance Paroloe and Employment applications (for my wife and I) three times. They have never sent me a bill for this, stating clearly that this falls within the overall green card application process. In my comments above, I emphasize on many occasion the financial matters related with this firm. It is also important to highlight the humane treatment you are accorded by everyone I worked with. The support staff and attorneys clearly understand the emotional stress involved in the immigration process and they treat you with respect and dignity. I have referred many friends of mine to Rajiv's office and they all state similar commendable experience. In short, I am glad I found this group of brilliant immigration attorneys and support personnel. I'm glad they were on my side and helped me win permanent residency. I can state without any hesitation that you will not be disappointed if you choose Rajiv's group to represent you. The level of service and support you will receive from the Law offices of Rajiv S Khanna will be far more than what you ever dream about. Many thanks to everyone at Rajiv's office for all the hard work. If there is anything I can every do in return please let me know....

Posted on: 
5th Sep, 2010

Guestbook Entry for Rajarshi (Raj) & Satarupa, United States

Name: 
Rajarshi (Raj) & Satarupa
State: 
Kansas City
Country: 
United States
Comment: 

We just did recently receive our US Green Card (EB2) for both my wife and me. Keeping all those melodrama apart, in short, is extremely pleased and has no words to express ourselves. We want to thank everyone working with Law Offices of Rajiv (Immigration.com) and especially Mathew, Suman-Ji, Bharathi, Anna, Rita and last but not the least Rajiv himself. On a true note, they are extremely professional and super prompt in answering any of your stupidest questions on Immigration. Rajiv is extremely desperate in taking cases through to positive destiny using and interpreting every piece of immigration law that according to me, a lot of his competitors would try and avoid.

In last 6-years they have done our multiple successful H1B/H4 renewals, this Green Card case, and hopefully would be the one helping us on our US Citizenship process, about 5-years from now.

All of you guys out there, if you have any immigration issues, and want a little piece of mind, please do not wait. schedule an immediate appointment with them and be happy from thereon.

Just for information, our US born baby girl is about 2.5 months old now. Once she grows up a bit, would surely want to pay them a visit. We wish them all the very best as of now and in future.

Posted on: 
23rd Jul, 2010

NBC Updates – 04/02/10

Work permits and c9 I-765 application - The center recommends applicants and attorneys to follow the current Pre-Order Instructions which points out that applicants should file the renewed I-485 application with the TSC (Texas Service Center) when the form has been denied and renewed by the IJ. This also holds well when the applicant or attorney submits a new Form I-485 application to the IJ. For more on this please visit the USCIS page on Immigration Benefits in EOIR Removal Proceedings and Pre-order Instructions

  

In order to grant employment authorization under 8 CFR 274a.12(c)(9). NBC continues to require evidence of a pending Form I-485. NBC will search USCIS systems, and other available systems, to determine if the applicant has an I-485 application pending at the time the I-765 c9 application is filed as part of the adjudication process. When filing a c9 I-765 application the burden of proof of a pending I-485 application lies with the applicant or representative.
NBC accepts the following forms of evidence in support of the c9 I-765 application:

1. I-485 application, without a receipt number, with evidence from the Clerk’s office that it has been accepted into the record.
2. A copy of the Court’s order noting that the I-485 application for relief has been received into evidence.
3. I-797 Receipt Notice for an I-485 filed with the Texas Service Center with an SRC receipt number.
4. A Notice of Hearing from the Court stamped with "Fingerprints required for Adjustment.”
5. An appointment letter from the Immigration Judge/Court, that bears a stamp indicating “AOS filed with the IJ.” 

Please note other court documents or USCIS documents indicating that an I-485 application is pending at the time the I-765 is filed is also acceptable. 

 

I-90 filings and duplicate cards - Unless the production of two cards occur simultaneously USCIS will not issue duplicate cards and the officer is unable to determine from USCIS systems that a card is already in production. The application the applicant is adjudicating should be ended when an officer determines that a card is in production from another or duplicate application. The applicant or representative may file an I-90D application, with no fee, to have the card corrected when an I-551 card is produced with a USCIS error. The applicant or representative should file an I-90E if an I-551 card is produced with an error or incorrect information due to the applicant or representative.

For more information on the instructions on I-90 check this link.

http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=b3f7ab0a43b5d010VgnVCM10000048f3d6a1RCRD&vgnextchannel=db029c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1RCRD

 

Service errors and fee - When an I-290B is received by the NBC it reviews the processing and adjudication of the application upon which the Motion is filed as part of the I-290B adjudication process. The center (NBC) precisely looks for service error to find out whether or not the Motion shall be approved or denied.

While processing the denied application if an administrative or adjudicative error occurred the motion will be approved and the denied application will be reopened and a refund will be issued for the motion. However in a case where the applicant or representative overcomes the grounds of denial, then the motion will be approved. The application which was denied will be reopened and a refund will be issued for the motion. 

 

 Re-scheduling adjustment interviews - The applicant or representative should call the National Customer Service Center at 1-800-375-5283 as stated on the Interview Appointment Notice to re-schedule adjustment interviews. To re-schedule adjustment interviews an electronic referral with the request to reschedule the applicant will be sent to the NBC for MSC cases. NBC will forward the electronic referral to the office with jurisdiction if the interview has been scheduled by the Field Office. The Field Office with jurisdiction is in charge for rescheduling the applicant and notifying the applicant of the new date and time of the interview. NBC does not schedule or reschedule applicants for interview.

 

Field Office jurisdiction - Using the applicant’s address from the I-485 application the Field Office jurisdiction is established. NBC will send the Interview Appointment Notice to the attorney or representative of record, as well as the applicant if the applicant has a G-28 on file.

 

Specific guidelines for submitting medical examinations for pregnant beneficiaries - A Civil Surgeon performs the Medical Examination and Review or Administer appropriate vaccinations for a pregnant applicant. He will be able to identify contraindications and precautions to vaccinations, such as live attenuated vaccines (MMR, Varicella, Zoster, Influenza) which should not be administered to pregnant women and also he will be able to document the information on the Form I-693 Medical Form.

For more information on this visit this website http://www.cdc.gov/

 

Possible “interview waiver” cases - By means of an electronic sweep of the case’s information obtained from the I-485 and/or I-130, if present NBC identifies cases that may be eligible for an interview waiver in part. Some of the possible “interview waiver” cases are

 

1. Unmarried minor children and stepchildren of US Citizens (IR7 and CR7)

2. Parent of US Citizen (IR0)

3. K1/K2 entrant— Fiancé(e) of US Citizen and children of Fiancé(e) (CF1/CF2)

4. Native/Citizen of Cuba filing under 11/2/66 Act (also spouses/children) (CU6/CU7)

5. Unmarried & Under 14 year old child of Lawful Permanent Resident (F27)

The integrity of all Family Pack applications will be maintained by NBC. None of the cases in the Family Pack will be selected for “interview waiver” if one or more cases in a Family Pack does (do) not meet the interview waiver criteria.

If an MSC case is sent to the Service Center for adjudication and the Service Center determines that an interview is required. The application will be sent back to NBC for completion of any pre-interview processing steps and scheduling of the interview by the Field Office.  

The Service centers send some employment-based I-485 applications are sent to NBC. The Service Centers have determined that these applications require an interview. The pre-interview processing steps that NBC normally takes, for I-485 family-based applications, are very limited in employment-based cases. Such cases are scheduled for interview by the Field Offices. Contact Service Center Operations for further information regarding the criteria utilized by the Service Centers to determine when employment-based I-485 cases require an interview. 

USCIS guidance regarding interview waiver cases may be found in the Adjudicator’s Field Manual (AFM), Chapter 23.2, General Adjustment of Status Issues, see (h) Interview Waivers.

http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.f6da51a2342135be7e9d7a10e0dc91a0/?vgnextoid=fa7e539dc4bed010VgnVCM1000000ecd190aRCRD&vgnextchannel=fa7e539dc4bed010VgnVCM1000000ecd190aRCRD&CH=afm

 

N-400 cases - As of December 2008 all newly filed N-400 applications are filed at the Phoenix or Dallas lockbox depending on jurisdiction.

 

Requests for Evidence on an N-400 and 485 when the applicant checks item D. 16 and arrests. - Original or certified copies of court orders, statements, dispositions, and/or police records are required at the time of the interview for both the I-485 & N-400 process. At the time of interview a naturalization applicant receives the CFR Notice (Complete File Review) which is designed to advise the applicant of case specific documents that the Service may require. Unlike an RFE it is merely an advisory notice to help the applicant and the CFR Notice does not place a hold on the N-400 application. N-400 applicants also receive Form N-659, Naturalization Interview Document Check List, which is sent with their Interview Appointment Notice. This notice advises the applicant of all documents that may be required at the time of interview. NBC does not RFE for specific documents for an N-400 application. An I-485 applicant may receive an RFE for police records/court documents for possible inadmissibility issues. A petitioner may receive an RFE for police records/court document in Adam Walsh cases.

  

Time taken between filing and receiving I-797 receipt notices - Receipt notices are issued by the Lockboxes. For concerns about specific forms and other inquiries USCIS has established a dedicated email account. Lockboxsupport [at] DHS [dot] gov 

 

I-824 for the purpose of “follow to join,” and I-824 filed for the purpose to receive a “Duplicate approval notice” - For the purpose of “follow to join,” the I-824 is generally filed concurrently with the I-485 Family-Based Adjustment of Status application package. For more information on this click here.

http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=3faf2c1a6855d010VgnVCM10000048f3d6a1RCRD&vgnextchannel=db029c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1RCRD 

On the other hand for the “Duplicate approval notice,” if the receipt number of the approved application begins with MSC, then the I-824 should be sent to the Chicago Lockbox. NBC does not receipt in applications or accept fees.

The Lockbox has accepted stand-alone I-824 applications at the following address:

USCIS Lockbox

P.O. Box 805887

Chicago, IL 60680-4120

The following address should be used for courier service:

USCIS

Attn: FBAS

131 South Dearborn-3rd Floor

Chicago, IL 60603-5520

 

TSC Updates – 01/28/2010

Processing time of I-765 and I-131s - The EAD processing time should be back down to an average of around 45 days. The center aims to adjudicate all I-765s and I-131s within 50 to 55 days.  

For more updates click here .

TSC Updates – 01/28/2010

Processing time of I-765 and I-131s - The EAD processing time should be back down to an average of around 45 days. The center aims to adjudicate all I-765s and I-131s within 50 to 55 days.

EB-1 Adjudication issues - The center continues to train officers on EB-1 adjudication issues as the nature of EB-1 extraordinary ability and outstanding researcher cases is such that there will always be some differences as to whether a case is approvable. Petitioners are urged to organize both the original submission as well as any RFE response. This in a way makes it clear which evidence supports each particular qualifying criteria. The use of indexes and tabs may be helpful in organizing the filing.

Denial of an immigrant petition or adjustment of status application without RFEs - Petitions that do not have the required initial evidence can be denied without the issuance of an RFE. If the required initial evidence is provided but the officer has a question about the approvability of the case or requires additional information/documentation, an RFE typically will be issued. A NOID will be issued if the officer adjudicating the case and is leaning toward a denial but a rebuttal to the specific reason for denial would assist in ensuring an appropriate adjudication.

Separated Derivatives - The center advises that for cases where it appears the Derivative is still pending and is approvable which also includes a current priority date an e-mail has to be sent through the streamline address at Streamline [dot] Tsc [at] dhs [dot] gov

Derivative child and biometrics - The center makes efforts to arrange for the Derivative child to be scheduled for biometrics around 4 months before he or she reaches age 14. An e-mail can be sent through the TSC Streamline address at Streamline [dot] Tsc [at] dhs [dot] gov if a Derivative child has not been scheduled for biometrics for 4 months after his or her 14th birthday. Unless specifically requested it is best that applicants in this situation do not send a G-325 or other documents.

I-485 of a minor child transferred for an interview -  Usually children are not scheduled for an interview without the parents also being scheduled. But in some cases this could be possible. In cases where it appears that a child entered the U.S. without inspection an interview would be scheduled.

To interfile a new G-28 - Filing a G-28 by adding a brightly colored cover sheet (blue in particular) helps in identifying the submission as a new G-28. To interfile a new G-28 send the G-28 to PO Box 850891, Mesquite, TX 75185-0891.

Receipts -  For payment of I-485A penalty when filed separately from the I-485 in EOIR case there is no automated process for issuing receipts. The center issues it manually.

USCIS Q&A: Filing a Form I-485, I-765, and I-131 for Refugees and Asylees

USCIS offers a Questions and Answers to clarify issues on filing adjustment applications, work authorization documents, and refugee travel documents for refugees and asylees.

Guestbook Entry for Shivanand Baswannappa , United States

Name: 
Shivanand Baswannappa
State: 
Texas
Country: 
United States
Comment: 

Excellent and Timely job by Aruna, Prerna & Bhrathi And Timely & Accurate advice by "The Big" Mathew. We got our anxiety put to rest in respect of our daughter's college admission with pending GC. last night we got our "card production ordered" email from CRIS. Today we are truly global residents with Indian background, New Zealand citizenship and now PR of United States. Thanks to R Khanna and his incredible staff and ofcourse my employer Multivision Inc. who have supported throughout the GC process going beyond the business.

Shiva B &
Family

Posted on: 
10th Jun, 2008

Guestbook Entry for Mark Kalmykov & Nataliy Yakovlev , United States

Name: 
Mark Kalmykov & Nataliy Yakovlev
State: 
CA and VA
Country: 
United States
Comment: 

My wife and I got the I-485 approval in March 2008. We filed the I-140 & I-485 in February 2006. The LC PERM was done by Rajiv’s law firm too. The I-140 was approved in 4 months without any issues.
Mostly I dealt with Prerna Mehta and Jitesh Malik. Both provide me excellent help and support during the process. Malik called me on my cell phone to answer my questions, and he was polite, fast and correct. Also, I praise Prerna for checking my documents and forms thoroughly and providing correction/feed back immediately.
My sincere thanks to you Mr. Khanna, for all the help and guidance that you gave us through out the application process. You were always ready to answer all my questions and I really appreciate all the help that you provided.
In future if I need any immigration help I would definitely go for Rajiv firm. If anybody has any help needed about immigration I would highly recommend Rajiv firm.

Posted on: 
4th Apr, 2008
Nonimmigrant Visas
Green Cards
Common Topics
Professions